Pa Work Injury Law: defective machine

Showing posts with label defective machine. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

The most painful warning sign EVER!

That looks like it hurts....

And that's why open machinery must be guarded, either by an actual guard or by distance or location. Many of our work injury cases stem from employees having their hands and arms caught in unguarded machinery, causing severe damage, including amputation.

Monday, August 31, 2009

The 5 Most Common Building Site and Construction Accidents

Many of our Pennsylvania workers' compensation clients are construction workers. In my years as a workers' compensation lawyer, I've seen just about every type of work injury there is to get on a construction or building site. This article explores some of the more common construction accidents in the workplace.

Ladders.

Ladders always carry a danger. When ladders are used to move between different levels on a construction site injury can be caused in a number of ways. One of the more serious injuries we have seen was when someone had failed to secure a ladder to the next level. As the user ascended the ladder it came away from the scaffolding causing him to fall over 30 feet to the floor, shattering his heel in the process.

Other injuries using ladders occur when someone is carrying equipment which is too heavy, causing them to fall away from the ladder, or when there is insufficient ladder protruding above the next level causing the user to miss their footing with nothing to hold onto.Falling Debris.

Another common cause of accidents is debris falling from a height landing on workers on lower levels or working on the ground levels. Depending on the item that is dropped (from wooden planks to brickwork) and the height it is falling these accidents can cause severe injuries.Falling From Heights.

Due the nature of a construction site many workers are working at several stories high. Roofers particularly are at risk from falling from a great height. If the fall is as a result of poorly constructed scaffolding or a defective roof you may be able to make a claim for compensation. This could also be the case if you have not been provided with the correct safety equipment or the right level and amount of training.

Machinery.

If you are using power tools on a construction site these can lead to injury either through defects in the machinery itself, inadequate training or failure to provide the correct safety equipment.

Trips and Slips.

Due to the amount of equipment on a construction site it is quite common for workers to slip or trip over discarded equipment or debris and suffer injury. This can be particularly hazourdous if the trip or slip leads the victim to fall into holes on the site. Trips and slips are a common hazard on a building site, and whilst each employee must take all necessary action to prevent injury, if the employer has failed to take the necessary steps you will be able to make a claim for compensation.Summary.

A construction site is a dangerous place to work, but your employer must do all that they can to keep you safe. If they fail to discharge their duty to protect you and you suffer injury, you can make a claim for compensation for your pain and suffering, loss of earnings and any other expenses.

Thanks to Nick Jervis for this information. You can read more about being Injured At Work? Find out more about Work Accidents generally and read our Free Work Accident Claims Guide. Nick Jervis is a solicitor (non-practising) and a consultant to Work Accident Solicitors who specialise in Work Accident Claims.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Former Welder's $1 Million Verdict Will Stand

Though the welding industry continues to vigorously defend itself against a growing tidal wave of welding rod litigation, it was dealt a serious blow in March 2006 when its repeated attempts to overturn a welding rod fumes case failed in the Illinois Supreme Court. The case is a landmark in welding rod litigation, in which former welders claim that exposure to fumes from welding rods caused manganism and even Parkinson's disease.

The Original Case

Though several welding rod cases have produced multi-million dollar settlements, the original case in question is a landmark because it is the only welding rod verdict ever decided in favor of the plaintiff. The case, entitled Elam v. A.O. Smith, contended that the plaintiff, a 64-year-old Illinois welder who worked in the profession for 30 years, suffered neurological damage from long-term exposure to the toxic fumes that are a byproduct of welding rods. The case was previously tried before a hung jury (Illinois law demands a unanimous jury); in its retrial, Jack Elam was awarded $1 million in "compensatory damages" for his welding rod-related Parkinson's disease. The jury found that A.O. Smith failed to provide adequate safety warnings about the dangers of manganese in welding rod fumes.

The verdict was a watershed in more ways than one - it unleashed a wave of welding rod litigation once attorneys knew that it was possible for a verdict to be awarded in the plaintiff's favor. The welding rod cases have become so numerous that a multi-district litigation is underway in Ohio; it numbers well over 3,000 plaintiffs.

Lost on Appeal

The defendants in the original case quickly appealed the case, contending that it did in fact adequately warn workers of the dangers of working with welding rod fumes. However, in December 2005, the 5th District Appellate Court of Illinois found that the company did not warn workers adequately, upholding the $1 million verdict. On second appeal, the court was taken up before the Illinois Supreme Court. However, it dealt a devastating blow to the welding industry - and gave an encouraging nod to former welders looking to get compensated for their own occupational welding rod-related illnesses - when it effectively upheld the verdict by declining to review the case.

Former Welders Cling to Hope; Continue to Litigate

Despite the fact that the $1 million verdict is the only one ever given to a welding rod litigant, former welders who are suffering from Parkinson's, manganism and other occupational illnesses related to their welding work are retaining hope. Welding rod attorneys hope that the Elam v. A.O. Smith will set a precedent that allows other litigants to collect damages for their occupational exposure to manganese. If you are suffering health problems due to your work as a welder, contact a doctor and then an experienced welding rod litigation attorney who can analyze your case and tell you whether you may be qualified to monetary damages.

_________________
LegalView, is the number one resource for everything legal on the Web and can be located at http://www.LegalView.com. LegalView has an array of practice areas that are continually updated to contain the latest news, jury verdicts and information. Two new practice areas relate to Vytorin, http://vytorin.legalview.com, and Zetia, http://zetia.legalview.com , which are cholesterol-reducing drugs discovered to be less effective than generic brands.

Monday, May 12, 2008

Work Injuries Due to Inadequate Machine Guarding

In the United States, there are millions of workers that endure hard labor jobs, which require physical interaction with machines to build, develop, construct or weld together buildings, cars, etc. However, thousands of those workers are injured on the job annually. One of the most common types of workplace injuries occurs when machine operators suffer amputations, lacerations, de-gloving or other serious injuries from the operation of machinery, which is not properly guarded.

Moving machine parts can cause severe injuries. Machine guards are essential to protect workers from preventable injuries. Whenever the operation of a machine can injure the operator or others, the hazards must be either eliminated or designed out of a product.If this is not possible and the hazard cannot be eliminated, it must be guarded against and a warning must be provided to avoid the hazard. This is often referred to as the "Engineering Hierarchy": design out, guard against and warn.

Many guarding principles have been in use in the industry for over 100 years. For example, the first patent for an interlocking guard was awarded in 1899 for a power press. However, while guarding technology has been readily available for decades, many manufacturers fail to avail itself of basic safety engineering that could save lives and prevent needless suffering and tragedy. Because of this neglect or disregard for a company's employees, the creation of a employee compensation lawsuit may occur to bring safety to a workplace and dissolve remaining threats.

There are many types of guards that are appropriate for different products depending on the use for which the product is intended. Some examples of guards include fixed barrier guards, movable interlocking guards, and light curtains and sensors that detect the entry of fingers or the operator's hands.

Machine guarding cases involving serious injury due to improper guarding often involve situations where a product had a poorly designed guard that was removed exposing the operator to serious injury. If the manufacturer could have, and should have reasonably expected that the guard would be removed, the removal of the guard does not shield the manufacturer from liability.

Additionally, if a company does not fit hazardous machines with safety gear, workers should be advised to contact a law firm that is experienced in developing employee safety lawsuits. When an employer refuses to ensure the safety of its workers, or merely disregards the safety of its workers, they can be held responsible.

____________________________________
LegalView.com is your source for everything legal. Visit http://legalview.com/. Visitors to LegalView.com can get help to find a construction accident lawyer, a mesothelioma attorney, and more. You can also find information on the Baxter Heparin recall at http://baxter-heparin.legalview.com/.

Successful Case Results

Dandy Mini Mart back injury Lump Sum Settlement - $157,000.00

A 38 year old woman who worked as a clerk at a local Dandy Mini Mart suffered a serious work related back injury several years ago. After the employer, Dandy Mini Mart, denied her claim, James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire litigated her case and won, forcing Dandy Mini Mart to pay for back surgery and wage loss benefits. After several years of being on workers' compensation, Jim negotiated a lump sum settlement with Dandy Mini Mart in the amount of $157,000.00-- $70,000.00 was a lump sum paid to the injured worker and $87,000.00 was paid to the injured worker to pay for her future medical treatment, which consisted mostly of monthly prescriptions.

WalMart Truck Driver Lump Sum Settlement - $150,000.00

46 year old Walmart truck driver who was involved in a work related truck accident. The client suffered from a back injury. He was on workers' compensation for a few years then returned to part time driving. We settled his workers' compensaiton case for a lump sum of $150,000.00.

Bridge Construction worker with herniated discs in neck - $385,000.00

43 year old male who was a highly paid bridge construction worker injured his neck while lifting on the job. He ultimately had to undergo two cervical surgeries to repair herniated discs in his neck. Thereafter, he developed RSD or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in his left arm. He ultimately lost the use of his left arm for every, practical uses. He also started experiencing the same symptoms in his right arm, all stemming from the neck injury.Carroll & Carroll, P.C. filed litigation. The insurance company accepted responsibility for the work injury and even agreed that the claimant lost the use of his left arm. However, the workers' compensation insurance company disputed the relatedness of the right arm. The case settled for $385,000.00 which is a record settlement for Carroll & Carroll, P.C. in a workers' compensation case. Also part of the settlement is that the insurance company has agreed to pay whatever medicare set aside amount is required by Medicare.

Repatative Use Injury to Arms - $175,000.00

53 year old woman had worked at a label making plant for over 20 years. Several years ago, she began having pain in her right arm when she would perform her highly repetitive duties making labels for clothing. When she was restricted to one arm work, she had to use her "good" arm too much and began suffering the same symptoms in the left arm.
Carroll & Carroll, P.C. filed a claim petition against the employer and won the case. The workers' compensation judge ruled that the claimant first suffered a right arm epicondylitis and then, due to over-use, suffered the same condition in her left arm later in her employment. An interesting twist in this case was that each "arm injury" was covered by a different insurance company due to the time the injuries arose.

Eventually, Carroll & Carroll, P.C. was able to secure a settlement for the claimant that protected her future medical bills and allowed her to retire with no financial worries.

Loss of use of arm for lumber yard worker - $150,000.00

27 year old male who was working at a local lumber yard injured his arm on a piece of the industrial machinery used to plane wood. While clearing out pieces of debris from the machine, another employee turned it on, locking the client's arm in the machine and causing injury. The client's arm was significantly injured, needing many surgeries.Carroll & Carroll, P.C. filed a petition to force the workers' compensation insurance company to pay the client specific loss benefits. These are benefits an injured employee receives when he/she loses the use of a body part. We argued that the client lost the use of his arm due to the injury. We eventually settled the case for a lump sum payment of $150,000.00. Also, the client is on social security disability. Carroll & Carroll, P.C. has also filed a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer of the machine due to it being defective for not having proper safeguards designed into the machine.

Construction worker broke leg requiring surgery - $145,000.00

While on a job site, a 45 year old construction worker tripped over some boards, breaking his leg. The break was so bad that surgery had to be done to place screws and plates to mend the bones. Unfortuneately, the client's leg was so disabled that he could not return to construction work. Further, the client developed RSD or what is now referred to as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Carroll & Carroll, P.C. was able to win the client's comp benefits after the insurance company denied him what was owed to him. Further, we were able to secure Social Security Disability benefits for the client, then settle his workers' compensation claim for $145,000.00. After the comp settlement, the client will continue to receive his monthly SSD check plus have all of his medical bills paid for through Medicare.

Shop Teacher Amputates Fingers on Table Saw - $125,000.00

A Vocational Tech teacher for a local school severely injured his hand while using a table saw in shop class. Even though the teacher returned to work after a brief period, Carroll & Carroll, P.C. filed a claim for the "specific loss" of use of several fingers.

We were able to prove that the teacher had loss the use of three fingers either through outright amputation or severe damage. The case was ultimately settled for a lump sum of $125,000.00 including the payment of all medical bills and the waiver of the workers' compensation lien against any recovery from the product liability case against the table saw manufacturer.

Lumbar Surgery - $110,000.00

38 year old male injured his lower back while lifting something heavy at work. He eventually had lumbar spine surgery and was totally disabled. He had been on workers' compensation for many years before coming to Carroll & Carroll, P.C. for help in getting some medical bills paid.
We made sure he was approved for Social Security Disability and Medicare. Then we settled his workers' compensation case for $110,000.00. Now the claimant does not have to worry about his benefits being cut off or looking over his shoulder all the time worrying that someone was watching him. He did not have to go to hearings anymore and could move on with his life.

Loss of Use of Hand - $110,000.00

60 year old woman had her hand trapped in a conveyor belt while working at a local cabinet making plant. After several surgeries on her hand and a partial amputation of her index finger, she no longer had much use of the hand. The lawyers at C&C Law filed a petition for specific loss of use of her hand. We put on such a good case that we were able to settle her case for a $110,000.00 lump sum payment plus continued medical coverage for 2 years.

Blister On Foot Nets Big Comp Settlement - $90,000.00

45 year old male who injured his foot at work causing swelling. Because he continued to keep working with the swelled foot, a blister appeared due to his tight fitting shoe. Unfortunately, the blister became infected with MSR. The employee went through many surgeries and loss of a few toes due to the infection. Complicating matters was the fact that the employee had pre-existing diabetes that was obviously not related to work and that contributed to the infection not healing. So, the insurance company argued that the employee's current condition was not related to the original work injury but to his diabetes.

Carroll & Carroll, P.C. filed a Specific Loss petition claiming that due to the many surgeries and infection and loss of a few toes, the claimant had loss the use of his entire foot as if it was actually amputated. Also, there was a question as to jurisdiction of the case. The insurance company wanted to have the case heard in either Maryland (where the original foot injury occurred) or New Jersey (where the employer's corporate headquarters was located) or in New York (where claimant lived), three states that are not as good for injured workers as Pennsylvania.

We were able to negotiate with the insurance company to have the case heard in Pennsylvania. Also, we were able to get all of the medical bills paid. Further, we were able to convince the insurance company that the claimant actually loss the use of his foot. The case was settled for a lump sum of $90,000.00. Also, the claimant was approved for Social Security Disability so he will be receiving monthly benefits in order to pay his living expenses. Further, he was approved for medicare so his future medical bills will be paid.

Shoulder rotator cuff tear with surgery - Shoulder rotator cuff tear with surgery- $85,000.00

A 49 year old woman injured her left shoulder while working at a plastic bag manufacturer. She ultimately had two surgeries to repair a torn rotator cuff. She was eventually returned to work light duty work, but her employer did not have any light duty available.Carroll & Carroll, P.C. forced the insurance company to pay some medical bills and prescriptions that were outstanding. Eventually, the client wanted to settle her case. C&C Law was able to negotiate a lump sum settlement of $85,000.00. Further, we made sure that the client's future medical bills would be covered by other insurance.

Work related back injury but no surgery - $80,000.00

A 26 year old man injured his back lifting something heavy while working at Proctor and Gamble in Meshoppen, Pennsylvania. The client was off work due to his injuries despite the fact that P&G wanted him to come back to work on light duty. The client did not have surgery on his lumbar spine. We were able to settle the case for a lump sum amount for $80,000.00.

Arm Caught In Defective Conveyor Belt In Meat Plant- $500,000+

A 29 year old meat processing worker had his arm caught in a defectively designed conveyor system that lacked the proper guarding. Worker suffers from severe brachial plexus injury to arm and shoulder. We were able to litigate the issue of "specific loss of use" of the arm and won that issue. After settling a third party persoanl injury case against the manufacturers of the conveyor system for a multi-million dollar amount, we settled the workers' compensation case for a lump sum amount that included the establishment of a Medicare Set Aside account that will pay for the injured employee's medical bills for the rest of his life. We also were able to settle the wage portion of his claim that paid him a few hundred thousand lump sum, above and beyond what was paid in the third party case.

GAS INDUSTRY WORKER TRIP AND FALL ON PIPE- $230,000.00

A 58 year old Marcellus Shale Gas Industry worker tripped over a pipe on a well pad site and fell, injuring his ankle. Unfortuneately, the original injury turned into Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (formerly called "RSD") which causes severe pain disability in the affected area. The workers' compensation insurance company disputed that the worker had Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and filed a petition to stop the weekly wage benefits and medical benefits. We were able to keep the wage benefits coming so the employee and his family wouldn't become destitute. Eventually we were able to negotiate a lump sum settlement with the insurance company for $230,000.00.

Client Testimonials

Workers Compensation:

At first I was afraid to contact an attorney because I thought it might affect my job. But the staff and attorneys at Carroll & Carroll, P.C. set me at ease right at the start of my case. They were all very helpful. All of my questions and concerns were always answered. And I was very satisfied with the settlement of my case. This is a very caring law firm and that's why I would recommend them to my family and all of my friends. They helped me gain more self confidence than I had before.

Shirley Goble
Athens, PA

_______________________________

Dog Attack:

I found your firm to be very caring which made me feel comfortable even though I wished this never happened to me. Everyone that I came into contact with at the office treated me with respect and individual attention. I truly believe I was given the best advice and was in truly caring hands.

Betty Lewis
Towanda, Pa
____________________________

Workers' Compensation:

Carroll & Carroll, P.C. exceeded my expectations and everyone who works there was very helpful. Without C&C, I couldn't have kept my wits about me. Nor would I have got the settlement that I did. I would recommend C&C Law to everyone. Thank you so much!

Gary Martz
Chemung, NY

___________________________

Workers' Compensation:

Carroll & Carroll, P.C. exceeded my expectations. Everyone at the firm went above and beyond for my case. I would recommend Jim Carroll to everyone. Overall, I was satisfied with the settlement of my workers' compensation case.

Terry Plumely
Painted Post,NY
________________________

Workers' Compensation:

I want to thank all of the staff at Carroll & Carroll, P.C. I can't pick just one, they all went above and beyond and were so nice. Thank you for working so hard on my case. Because of the successful outcome I was able to travel to Texas to visit my son.

Gordon Collins
Horseheads, NY
______________________

Workers' Compensation:

I want to thank you for all the time you and your staff has put into my case. You will never know how much it means to me and how much of a weight has been lifted off of me knowing that all of you are so good to me and that you are there for me. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Dorothy Leckie
Mifflinville, PA
______________________

Workers' Compensation:

I thank God I went on the internet and found your law firm. You have helped change my life and added some years that are stress free. My family says that I was a changed person once I talked to Jim and Carla about my case and my future employment opportunities. Thank you all.

Jo Ann Daly
Sayre, PA
_______________________

Workers' Compensation:

Before my work injury, I could have done any kind of work. Now I can't. But Jim and Carla taught me a lot about Pennsylvania's workers' compensation system and won my case for me. They were always there to answer my questions and keep me up to date on my case. Even though I was afraid to hire an attorney at first, Carroll & Carroll, P.C. greatly exceeded my expectations. I've already referred family and friends to them.

Donna Pozzi
Towanda, Pa
________________________

Work Injury:

Although I was afraid to hire an attorney at first, Jim answered all of my questions and made me feel a lot better. Carroll & Carroll, P.C. exceeded my expectations and I received a lot more money for my injuries than I thought.

Carl Button
Wyalusing, Pa
____________________

Slip and Fall:

Right from the beginning Jim answered all of my questions and was very patient with me. I was terrified of lawyers because there are a lot of shifty lawyers out there. The staff of Carroll & Carroll, P.C. was so helpful. Carla did so much for me, even travelling to Philadelphia when I had to see the insurance company doctor. I'm so satisfied in in outcome that Jim got for me. I'm financially secure now and don't have to worry about suporting myself and my family. I've already referred friends and family to Carroll & Carroll, P.C.

Lisa Spinner
Barton, NY
____________________

Workers' Compensation:

All I can say is that they didn't quit on me. My case was a long battle but Jim won it. Then he was able to get me a great settlement that made me financially secure in my retirement. They treated me like I was part of the family.

Sandy Henry
Sayre, Pa
____________________

Workers' Compensation:

I wasn't sure I had a case but Jim was very helpful and reassuring. I don't have to worry about my medical bills. Jim made sure that they were taken care of. He always kept me informed and was quick to answer to emails. I would recommend Carroll & Carroll, P.C. to everyone!

John Bryerton
Sayre, PA
____________________

Workers' Compensation:

The way Jim took over and handled everything was unbelievable. I didn't receive checks for months but as soon as Jim started working on my case I began receiving my checks again. I first went to a "big wig" firm but they did nothing for me. When I called Jim I got put right through or he would always return my calls. He even negotiated a great settlement for me that helped me move on from my injury and support my family.

Andrew Glover
Laceyville, Pa
_________________________